Monday, February 16, 2015

Much Ado about No Shakespeare

Back from yesterday's matinee performance of Much Ado About Nothing at Synetic Theater in Crystal City. This was the 11th of Synetic's renowned wordless (not silent) Shakespeare productions, an oxymoron that produces varied reactions (not unlike those when revealing that one is a Clay Aiken fan), ranging from bemused condescension to moral outrage.

Ben Cunis as Benedick and Irina Tsikurishvili as Beatrice. Program art for Much Ado About Nothing, Synetic Theater.

Shakespeare, of course, offered the world more than poetry, and the gift of the Synetic approach is that it winkles out the subtleties of character development and the nuances of situation comedy--and tragedy--that is also all Shakespeare. A wordless theatrical production of Shakespeare is every bit as legitimate as the Prokofiev Romeo and Juliet or the Mendelssohn Midsummer Night's Dream, and music and dance are among my favorite tools in the artistic toy box.

It's interesting that a lot of the updates of spoken Ado are set in the black-white-silvery worlds of Art Deco, leaving all color to the language, whereas the text-free Synetic production is all color and movement and music. Set in Fifties-era Las Vegas, with showgirls and motorcycle gangs (wearing "Syneticon" gang leather jackets), this Ado drives a harsher wedge between light and dark, farce and ferocity, through sheer physical power--not just the athleticism of the dance and pantomime, but also the attention given to details in props, costumes, lights, and music. All senses are on alert and fully, energetically engaged.

There is, appropriately, a parental advisory on this production, which goes a bit beyond the bard's usual bawdy humor: "This production is recommended for ages 14+ for some drug use and stylized sexual content." It's not for those squeamish about hypodermic needles, either.

Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare
Synetic Theater (1800 South Bell Street, Crystal City, Virginia 22202), through March 22, 2015
Directed by Paata Tsikurishvili, choreographed by Irina Tsikurishvili



Thursday, January 29, 2015

Blistered, Burned, Enraptured

Back from last night's first preview performance of Gina Gionfriddo's Rapture, Blister, Burn, at the Round House Theatre, and the only glitch in the proceedings was that they brought the houselights up when the audience was trying to give the cast a standing ovation. I felt a little cheated out of showing them the love.


Previously in Hosaa's Blog, I reported very little about my experience with Gionfriddo's last play on the RHT stage, Becky Shaw. Didn't like it. The characters were just not people I wanted to spend two hours of my life with. With RBB, however, I had more in common with the characters: two 40-something women--one married and the other a single, successful academic--and the lunk of a husband/love interest they shared, plus the 70-something mother of the single scholar, and one wiseass 20-something babysitter/would-be reality-TV developer.

Oh, exactly which character did I "relate" to? "Cathy" (Michelle Six), the single, successful academic, you say? Ha Ha Ha! Well, actually, the part about her that I did relate to was her relationship with her mother, "Alice" (Helen Hedman), and the realization that no man would ever love her the same way that her mom did. That part is true, and a lot of us just don't realize that until mom dies. That's a shame.

I could actually connect a bit with the lunk of a husband/love interest, "Don" (Tim Getman), because at the root of his problems is his own self-defeating awareness that he can't live up to other people's expectations of him or to his own sense of potential. He resorts to pot and porn to soothe his sagging ego and goes on letting down the two women who (inexplicably, IMO) love and compete for him. (I guess I know what I resort to--not pot and porn, though. *g*) 

The stay-at-home wife, "Gwen" (Beth Hylton), is the judgey recovering alcoholic who yearns for the presumably better life of the single friend whose boyfriend she stole and married rather than completing grad school.

And for a generational perspective to balance that of the not-dead-yet heart-attack-surviving mom, we get the babysitter "Avery" (Maggie Erwin, my new great actress to watch). The wise-beyond-her-years free spirit is appreciative of the freedoms won by our feminist ancestors but can't really relate to the problems of an earlier era. We can vote because suffrage was obviously right. Duh.

Maggie Erwin. Publicity photo via RHT Facebook.
The characters are not quite caricatures, but do come off as stereotypes. Or maybe archetypes. And the business of women yearning to switch lives with each other is nothing new (see Turning Point with Shirley MacLaine and Anne Bancroft, for example). Then there's the ridiculous plot device of having the wife and babysitter as the only students of the single-scholar for a seminar on feminism and female portrayals in popular culture--a seminar that takes place in the mom's house so we can get all the females in the same place together, relating their personal experiences to academic observations.

But the direction by Shirley Serotsky and acting by all (seriously, Erwin is a revelation) more than made up for these contrivances. The historic and cultural references (Betty Friedan and Phyllis Schlafly, the messages behind slasher movies) all brought out touchstones to touch and mull on. And instead of just being angry and making the audience angry (or defensive), the dialogue, the conversations, invited a lot of self-reflection. What do we want as women? And what happens if we get it? Or don't get it? And what do men have to do with it anyway?

I go back to the relationship between the mother and the grown daughter. My mother was just that supportive and nurturing (in her own weird, narcissistic way--that's another blog). Mothers teach their daughters that love means being supportive and encouraging, so we expect that in a husband. When the men turn out to expect that of their wives but not of themselves, that's where the frustrations start.

Avery is the one with the answer to all that crap. Maybe you just outsource it.

love, hosaa
Still thinking a butler would be better than a husband, in many ways.



Wednesday, January 21, 2015

The Prettiest Snow Melts the Fastest

Today, this happened in my town.

Credit: C. G. Wagner

Credit: C. G. Wagner

Credit: C. G. Wagner

Credit: C. G. Wagner

love, hosaa
catching snowflakes

Monday, December 22, 2014

Christmas Belle, or: Saving Miss Fezziwig

Another episode in the continuing adventures of Clarence, the It’s a Wonderful Life angel.

[Related reading: Saving Mr. Potter]

As Ebenezer Scrooge polished the knocker on his door, using the freshly gravy-daubed sleeve of his day coat as a Handi-wipeTM, Clarence beamed stupidly at the cloudstreaming vision of this oft-told tale.

“Oh, I just love it in high-def,” Clarence chirped as he stood up and stretched, “especially that little wink the knocker gives old Ebbie after he’s gone in and shut the door again. Tell me, Joseph, what’s your favorite part?”

Joseph was getting used to his doddering companion’s chronic cluelessness and patiently explained that effecting a miser’s spiritual resuscitation by loosening his purse strings for a day really wasn’t such a hard trick.

“It’s quite the roasted chestnut, really, as you can tell by all the versions there are,” said Joseph, helping Clarence tug down on his ivory fit-and-flare AngelwearTM to cover his fuzzy ankles. “Goes to show you what happens when you let your copyright expire. I’ve never understood the message, though,” he confessed.

“If I may,” Clarence offered, “it’s that you can buy love, am I right?” He delicately fingered the satiny fabric crisscrossing his clavicle. “Oh, I don’t like the sweetheart neckline so much, but it’s all they had when I got my promotion.”

Thunder clapped, as godly thunder does, not in applause but in appalled approbation.

“Oh-oh,” Clarence whimpered. “Um, I am in trouble again, am I not? Here Comes Mr. Jordan©.”

Jordan lightly pirouetted (a quadruple, no less) before presenting himself before his airy intern.

“Ah, dear Clara, how comely you are in ivory,” Jordan sighed with a merry purr.

“Clarence!” cried the intern. “Clara’s that Nutcracker© girl.”

“Ah, yes,” Jordan said, squinting at the odd bridal form before him. “It’s that Magoo© version, you know. I empathize a little too much. [In his best Jim Backus] Ah, Jordan, you’ve done it again!”

Joseph struggled to retain his relevance in the plot, for he usually has little to do or say at this point in the Jordan viz. Clarence proceedings. With a wiggle and an ahem, he succeeded in catching his supervisor’s squinting eye.

“We were just discussing the moral of the story, Mr. Jordan. I’m afraid that Clarence, here, was under the impression that Mr. Scrooge lived happily ever after.”

Mr. Jordan’s twinkly eyes grayed with sadness as he replayed on the Sony® CloudstreamTM the scene of our dear hero, having emptied his personal cash boxes to treat the neighborhood to Christmas dinner, returning to an empty home.

“Tsk, tsk, tsk,” Mr. Jordan tutted. “It’s a shame that you never got past Tom Sawyer in your literature assignments, my dear Clarence. You really should have stuck with Dickens all the way. There’s Bleak House and Oliver Twist, for instance—so much more to say on capitalism and social inequality and its consequences. But no, you left it to Piketty and such to have to show where things in the nineteenth century all went hoo-hah.”

“But Tom Sawyer did show picketty fences and how to whitewash them,” Clarence protested.

“That little Machiavellian fool,” Jordan sneered. “His friend Huckleberry was the true moral touchstone in Twain.”

Joseph helpfully wiggled and ahemed again to rein the plot that threatened to gallop away.

“Thank you, Joseph,” Mr. Jordan said, adjusting his own posture to something more professorial and Mr. Chips©-like. “Clarence, my good fellow, I am sending you on another assignment. Now, tell me, whose soul has been left behind in this Carol? What lives were omitted when, thanks to the protocols of serial publication, narrative momentum prevailed over backstory?

Clarence sat down again, hiking up the tulle poofery around his ankles, and scratched his shaggy head. These actions in no way facilitated his imagination.

“Let me think, now,” he thought aloud. “That poor clerk, Cratchit, got a raise, check. Tiny Tim, affordable health-care subsidy, check. Oh, and I saw that old Jacob Marley was brought up the other day, thanks to his brilliant Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present, and Future® thingy. Good job, well done. I should go and pay him my compliments, should I not?”

Joseph glanced back over his shoulder to the holding room and reminded Mr. Jordan that Marley’s new hearing date had yet to be determined. As even Clarence now understood, spiritual missions are rarely so black-and-white, cut-and-dried as the storytellers would have us believe.

“Marley, then?” Clarence attempted. Joseph bowed his head in silent prayer for Clarence’s wit.

“Old Jacob Marley,” Jordan explained wistfully, “was not just Mr. Scrooge’s partner; he was his role model. And for that, he has much to account. However, though this episode shall retain his services, he is not our particular interest. Please, darling Clarence, think a little harder. Why are you wearing the bridal AngelwearTM?”

“Maybe if we’re dropping hints, we need more than some lacy tulle,” Joseph joked feebly.

Clarence began to feel the hint clamoring to his beaded bodice, and an expression not unlike a bride’s glow spread across his crinkly eyes.

“Oh my, my, we forgot the leading lady, didn’t we?” Clarence said at last. “Scrooge was in love, engaged to be married. What happened? I hardly remember that part. She said he fell in love with a golden idol, and then she dumped him. What happened to her? And how come he became so miserly in the first place?”

“Great questions, very astute,” Mr. Jordan praised. “Why don’t you go and find out.” As rhetorical questions often are, Jordan’s last was answered with a scene-changing wave of his wings, accompanied by his cherubic, Crest White Strip®-enhanced smile and a little less-aggressive thunderous fanfare.

Stepping out of the Wayback Machine®, Clarence instantly recognized the scene of Ebenezer Scrooge’s Christmas Past, the schoolroom from which his beloved younger sister, Fanny, had once fetched him home.

“Didn’t we go too far back on this?” Clarence muttered upwardly to Joseph, whom he knew was watching over his progress. “Fan is the sister, not the fiancée, right?”

“Hush, now, and just watch,” Joseph responded in a voice-over. “Follow them when they go, instead of following Ghost of Christmas Past and the old man.”

Clarence felt a bit proud with this discovery of the powers that angels have versus simple post-mortal ghosts. Sure enough, as GoCP left the scene, with the nightgowned, sleepwalking Mr. Scrooge in tow, Clarence was able to follow the younger schoolboy, Ebbie, who hopped into a one-horse open sleigh©-hey with Fanny and headed home.

With a Quantum Leap©-like wave of his bedazzled AngelwearTM Wing-a-Ding WingTM, Clarence accelerated time and place to the Scrooge family homestead, finding the patriarch pacing gloomily in his shabby study. The cold room and its furnishings, books and all, were coated in a thin gray veneer, which could have been either dust or hoarfrost, or both at once. The elder Scrooge welcomed his darling daughter with a warm embrace, burying his own tear-stained cheek on her Killer Rabbit®-trimmed cloak.

“Don’t cry, dear Papa, I’ve brought our Ebbie back home! He’ll cheer us with a song and a story, and he tells King Arthur’s Tales of Spamalot© so awfully funny! We’ll laugh and laugh and be oh so merry again!”

To his only son and heir, Scrooge Sr. offered a dignified but chilled and chapped handshake.

“Ni!” Ebbie offered feebly, to his father’s indifferent confusion. There was a generally awkward clearing of throats among the room’s population of Scrooges.

“Fan,” the father said to the merry child, “please go and tend the Jell-O® pudding. There’s a good dolly. We men have business to attend to.” Though wincing at the belittling epithet, Fan obeyed.

When the young female was safely removed from the scene of manly business, Father Scrooge grabbed a threadbare blanket off the back of a side chair and dusted off a spot for Ebbie to sit upon. The chill that met the boy in the seat of his pants moved rapidly through his heart and fed broken ice chips to his very soul.

“Ebenezer,” the father began hesitantly, “are you prepared to leave the fantasies and games of schoolboys behind?”

“Yes, Father,” said our heroic young liar.

“Remarkable boy,” old Scrooge mumbled thoughtlessly to himself. “Eb. Ebbie. Ebenezer. The truth is, you and your cherished sister are my only remaining … assets.”

Clarence could feel his face mirroring the confusion he saw on young Ebenezer’s countenance, a mix of disbelief and dismay, with a touch of sullen foreboding. The father continued, his melancholy voice leaving frosty echoes in the silent room.

“I find I must sell you both, and for a price unworthy of either of you.”

“What do you mean, sell, Father? What can you mean?”

“You are a clever boy, er, man, my son, and quite accomplished with your ciphering, your masters tell me. Here,” the elder Scrooge said, handing a ledger to his incredulous son. “Look through these pages, and tell me what you see.”

Young Scrooge did, indeed, have a gift for numbers and could see at a glance that his father was a financial moron. The red ink spewed like blood from dagger wounds, up and down the debit columns, on page after page.

“Father,” young Ebenezer said with an authority beyond his years. “You fatheadTM!” The patriarch dropped his head down remorsefully, surrendering his right to the respect due from one’s own offspring. “You humbug! I care not for my own fate; sell me to your highest bidder, if you will. I am prepared to be apprenticed anywhere. But what about Fan!! You monster, you fiend, you … humbug!”

As little Fan sprang back into the doorway to report good progress with the Jell-O®, she could not avoid infection from the room’s chill. “What’s this?” she cried. “What monstrous humbug hubbub could there be to do with me?” Scrooges pere and fil froze, not knowing how to hand the poor girl her fate.

“Don’t worry, little Fan,” Clarence called out to the vision of the child he could not interact with, she being but a phantom in the backstory of, well, a fictional character, after all. It’s hard not to want to get involved, admit it. “D’ohTM!” he exclaimed to himself, lightly slapping his own angelic forehead.

Recalling his mission, Clarence reassured himself that, however Fan was “sold” into the arrangement, her future marriage was written to be a reasonably contented one. Fast-forwarding himself in the Wayback Machine®, he learned that young Fanny Scrooge’s marriage would in fact last a satisfying 10 years into the life of her only child, to wit, Fred, the nephew she left for her beloved brother as a legacy of family happiness, should he have no other opportunities to attain such on his own.

Clarence joyfully clapped his hands together. “Opportunity! Family happiness! Finally, we get to the heart of the matter! What was her name again, the fiancée?”

“Belle,” Joseph responded authoritatively in his rich, baritone voice-over voice.

“Are you catching cold up there, Joseph? Never mind. What’s this place? Oh, Fezziwig’s warehouse. What did they actually keep in that place, anyway? I always wondered.”

Clarence took the liberty of scouting around the premises and was thrilled by the fabrics and garments he discovered stowed neatly away in cedar-lined crates: Satins, silks, velvets, crepes, laces, taffetas, organdies, and yes, yards and yards of tulle! Oh, my! And if that carton in the corner didn’t contain a shipment of ostrich feathers, Clarence would have cheerfully surrendered his own Wing-a-DingsTM on the bet.

But we digress. The Fezziwig House of Brides® was, in its day, a popular destination for young ladies with budgets compromised by general hard times. All mothers of the middle classes knew where to send their daughters, and the management’s cheerful temperament (and notorious carelessness with the placement of decimal points when totaling the bill) warranted no criticism. It was to this happy but soon-to-be bankrupt establishment that Ebenezer Scrooge found himself sold into apprenticeship, the principal complaint of his position being that it brought only already-spoken-for brides into his narrow society.

The exceptions among Ebenezer’s potential female companions were the assortment of daughters provided by the Fezziwigs, the top two of which were of age to become customers of the bridal house in which they had grown up playing make-believe Housewives of Victorian England©. It was the second of the two eldest Fezziwig offspring, the lovely Belle, who took the notion of allowing Ebenezer the opportunity to realize her fantasy. It was an opportunity in which Ebenezer, naturally, delighted.

As Clarence soon observed, the bridal warehouse apprenticeship brought one other odd character into Ebenezer’s narrow society: Jacob Marley, a rival warehouseman anxious to poach not the inventory but the talent so undeservedly devoted to Fezziwig and his infuriatingly fuzzy business practices. Marley entered the Fezziwig warehouse just now, slamming the old oak door behind him and bringing much of the winter air in with him.

“Marley,” Clarence muttered to himself when he saw the already-old man of business skulk into the establishment that promised only future joy. “I never did know what to make of him. Friend of Scrooge, business partner with Scrooge, during Scrooge’s scroogiest era. Mentor, eh? Why? You can see already he’s got not an ounce of human kindness coursing through his veins. Still, he did save Scrooge’s soul later on, didn’t he?”

“Hush, now, and just listen,” Joseph voice-overed patiently.

“I know, I know. No more spoilers.” Clarence trained his eyes on Ebenezer as the young Apprentice® watched Marley’s dealings with Mr. Fezziwig. With his angelic powers (and dramatic license), Clarence was able to hear what Ebenezer could not:

Fezziwig: “Please, my good Sir, Mr. Marley, it is Christmas Eve, after all! Shall we not put off this dour business until after we have all made merry? Join us this night, do, for we’ll have Cold BoiledTM and plenty of beer, and our favorite game of forfeits.”

Marley: “If it be forfeits you’re wanting, Sir, ye shall have your wish with the additional two days’ interest above what ye owe me now. I have your marker, same as I had old man Scrooge’s before you swooped in on my bounty.”

Fezziwig: “Oh, please. You were paid in full out of the bounty of the sale of Scrooge’s own flesh and blood. It is a tragedy when a man is reduced to selling his own children, and I have taken good care to treat young Ebenezer as my own. In fact, my dear wife and I have hopes of soon welcoming him as an honored son-in-law. My fair Belle has this very morning confessed a secret engagement, and—”

Marley: “AaaarrrrghTM!”

Fezziwig: “Well, don’t blame me if the football keeps getting snatched away before you get around to kicking it. Of all the Charlie Browns in the world, Jacob Marley, you’re the Charlie Browniest©.”

Marley: “Then you leave me no choice, Fezziwig. Surrender your apprentice to me, and I’ll expunge your debt.”

Fezziwig: “He won’t go. He’ll not have you for an employer, if I know young Ebenezer’s incorruptible heart.”

Marley: “Nothing so simple; I shall make him an offer he can’t refuse©. I shall make him my partner.”

The rest of this story line was as familiar to Clarence as Tom Sawyer’s fence-painting scheme. The only blank to be filled was how Marley got Scrooge to paint his fences. Our angelic project observerTM continued on his quantum leaping through time and space, observing the following not incidental (but egregiously edited out) plot point: Marley taking Scrooge on a tour of the ramshackle dwellings of the most indigent of debtors on the company ledgers, and Marley subsequently showing Scrooge the bitter Family Feuds© among these impoverished masses, by way of illustrating that, whether or not money buys happiness is not so relevant as whether the lack of it purchases misery, which, of course, it invariably did, at least in the anecdotal evidence Marley chose to present.

Indeed, Scrooge vowed never to go hungry again, No, nor any of his folks! If he had to lie, steal, cheat, or kill, as God was his witness, he’d never go hungry again©!

Sobbing helplessly, Clarence dabbed the tears from his craggy cheeks with the fleecy ends of his Wing-a-DingsTM. “I always cry when the Tara© theme plays.”

At last we turn our attention to the second-eldest Fezziwig daughter, Belle (or Isabelle, in some versions). A rarely reenacted episode from our original history shows Belle many years after she has abandoned Mr. Scrooge to his misunderstood pursuit of material well-being. She is a contented matron surrounded by a rambunctious brood of children. The brood’s father comes home on a Christmas Eve and tells this matron of spying her old friend, Mr. Scrooge, alone in his shabby office on the night that his partner, old Jacob Marley, lay dying. The couple have a good laugh over Scrooge’s self-imposed loneliness.

“That doesn’t sound right,” Clarence complained aloud. “No wonder they always leave that scene out.” He scrunched his scraggy brow down over his eyes, as though the repositioning provided more thinking room for his overtaxed brain. “The oldest daughter in that household does indeed resemble the young Belle who jilted poor Ebenezer. Clearly, Belle produced this daughter at some point. But how could she have found happiness with another husband when she had been so devoted to Ebenezer Scrooge? Does a bride Say Yes© to every Dress in the shop?”

A clap of heavenly thunder announced a swift scene change, and Clarence found himself returned to his home in the Celestial CloudSphere®, now ensconced in the Department of Rewrites and Redemptions. Mr. Jordan himself greeted him with that famously warm, twinkling squint. At a tall, wobbly clerk’s desk sat the Ghost of Marley, bent over an open script, scratching out unsuitable passages and replacing scene after scene in the old Carol.

“You see what happens to the poorer writers of Life’s stories,” said Mr. Jordan in a tone of gentle warning. “They are condemned to edit other people’s stories.” Turning his attention to Marley, he cried out, “How’s it coming, there, now? Are you up to Nephew Fred’s Christmas party in Stave Three?”

“Yes, Mr. Jordan, I’m just finishing up the second rewrite now,” Marley obsequiously lied.

“Now, Biff©, don’t try and con me,” Mr. Jordan responded suspiciously.

“I mean, I’m just starting that scene now.” Marley shrugged sheepishly and bent back down over the script.

“Oh, that Biff Marley,” Mr. Jordan sighed, “always trying to get away with something.”

“‘Biff’?”

Mr. Jordan sensed Clarence’s confusion—indeed, anticipated it—and volunteered to escort our friend through the proposed new backstory of Belle, the Neglected Love Interest. He waved his splendid custom AngelwearTM Wings-of-ZingTM and transported himself and his guileless pupil back to the room with the rambunctious brood.

“A minor adjustment, but a significant one,” Jordan preluded the scene before them.

The matronly Belle, seated by the fire with the daughter whose countenance mirrored her younger self, blushed with shame after laughing at the image of her lonely old friend entombing himself in a drab and desolate office.

“Uncle Billy was wrong to laugh at Mr. Scrooge so, wasn’t he, Mummy?” the younger female spoke quietly, drying her mother’s tears with a coarse flannel handkerchief. “We shouldn’t make fun of poor people, should we.”

Belle looked into her wise daughter’s bright emerald eyes. “Poor? Do you imagine Mr. Scrooge to be so poor, my love?”

“Yes, of course. A man is never rich who has no friends.”

Belle laughed at her darling girl’s fumbling logic and hugged her tenderly. “Then shall we make a pact to enrich this poor man one day?”

“Oh, yes, Mummy, let’s!” The two charitable females pinky-swore their allegiance to Mr. Scrooge’s future happiness.

The patriarch of the household lumbered back into the room to warm his McDonald®’s Mug-o-GrogTM by the fire, his rambunctious brood in tow. Even above the noise and caterwauling, he could hear the two ladies’ surreptitious plotting.

“Now, no surreptitious plotting, you two,” said this Uncle Billy, “or it’ll be back to the agency with the pair of you. Governesses and their daughters need to know their places, and their places are back into the schoolroom. These young geniuses of mine need discipline. I’ll not have them dream away their holidays©.”

Clarence grinned brightly. “Ah, so they are not married to each other after all! So, Belle is what, a widow or something?”

Mr. Jordan patted Clarence’s shoulder gently. “No, my dear Clarence. You are such a child, you understand so little of the human heart. In the accurate version of Miss Fezziwig’s backstory, she is what was once referred to as a ‘sadder but wiser girl©.’ Her daughter—if you’ll be so tolerant as to hear us out—her daughter is in fact the product of a post-betrothal, prenuptial moment of irrepressible passion.”

“Not Mr. Scrooge?” Clarence’s emotions teeter-tottered between shock and elation. He at last chose to stick it out on the elation side of the board.

“As sometimes happens with humans, their hearts got the better of them,” Mr. Jordan continued. He revealed the gist of the story quickly: Belle released Ebenezer from their engagement before learning she was bearing their child. Rather than returning to the fantasy world of her father’s then-crumbling House of Brides®, she enrolled in the Jane Eyre Academy of GovernessesTM in hopes of finding a respectable position in a liberal household. She was fortunate, as few in her situation were, to receive good references among several households, the last of which we have seen with this jovial but stern widower, “Uncle Billy.”

“That’s still Stave Two, though,” Clarence observed. “That’s Christmas Past territory, that.”

“True enough,” Mr. Jordan said. “I believe we will now have to switch the narrative to a present tense. Please bear with me.”

With a graceful sweep of the good old AngelwearTM, Mr. Jordan returns us to that exalted Christmas Day following Scrooge’s encounter with the three Ghosts bearing gifts of self-observant insight.

We scurry through Stave Five as our redeemed hero knows not how to control his impulse to overcompensate for an adulthood of miserly habits by handing out sacks and sacks of cash. It is dizzying to see the delight in the eyes of hungry children tasting Christmas candies while their tummies grumble for beef or fish. Their hearts are warmed fleetingly with fanciful toy soldiers and hobby horses, which they understand shall be stacked away in cold corners the rest of the winter, waiting to be broken up for kindling in the old wood stove.

Drunk with this spurious charity, Scrooge totters into his nephew’s humble home and is welcomed with surprised amusement among the party guests. He eats, he drinks, he plays games, he laughs until he cries. And all cry with him, pitying the loss of the man’s senses, even if they are despicable senses, indeed.

“Shall we call for the doctor?” asks Mrs. Fred, deeply concerned by the brightening redness in her uncle-in-law’s cheeks.

“He shall be fine in a moment,” responds a soft, lilting voice from a corner of the room. “He just has to learn how to live again.”

All eyes turn to the matronly governess quietly observing her old friend’s hijinks. She wrings out a cotton cloth in cool water, folds it in thirds, and carefully places it on the exhausted Mr. Scrooge’s forehead. His eyes glisten with recognition.

“Belle,” he sighs, finally surrendering to his exhaustion and falling into a deep, contented sleep.

And, true to their pinky-swear, Belle and her daughter would from thenceforth devote their lives to showing old Mr. Scrooge how to live again, with the purest love from the truest hearts.

“Now, about Jacob Marley, or Biff, or whatever you’re calling him now,” protested Clarence.

“Another year, dear Clarence,” Mr. Jordan replied. “We’ll give him another year or so. That one needs a lot of work.”

The End

Author’s note: Use of copyright, trademark, and registration symbols is largely ironic. Product placements are gratuitous and gratis, representing neither paid content nor endorsements. This story is copyrighted inasmuch as I claim to have written it, but sharing it beyond this post (with appropriate credit and linking) is okay by me. Screen or stage rights are available for Writers Guild minimum, some cookies, and a reasonable percentage of gross receipts, in perpetuity; negotiable.

Love, hosaa
wondering who needs saving next year


Saturday, December 6, 2014

Art versus Art Book: A Day with the Phillips Collection

A little bit of art therapy never hurt anyone, so off I went the other day to The Phillips Collection off Dupont Circle in Washington, D.C., where the big show on now is Neo-Impressionism and the Dream of Realities. It was here and in the room downstairs containing D.C. and Baltimore area twentieth-century artists that I was reminded again why you need to visit art in person and not just buy the exhibition books. Nice souvenirs, but not the same, really.

Yearning to get in? Bernardi Roig's light sculpture Acteón (2005), detail. Photo by C. G. Wagner
Roig's The Man of the Light (2005) illuminates the trek upstairs in the Phillips's grand stairwell. Photo via The Phillips Collection.

During my visit, I tried to spend a little more time looking at the art, noticing and noting. For example, there was a bit of damage at the bottom of Orange and Red on Red (1957), one of the four large canvases in the Rothko Room, which I never noticed before.

In the D.C.-Baltimore room, I loved the collection of like-themed circles and colors with Thomas Downing's Grid 31 (1970) and Blue Spell (1964) with Gene Davis's Untitled (1971) tall vertical rainbow board and the LED installation of concentric colored squares by Leo Villareal, Scramble (2011), which I'd advise you not to stare at. It'll burn your retinas out. 

It was Blue Spell that kept me a bit more spellbound, a piece that would seem somewhat monochromatic if examined from afar (or from a book), but upon closer inspection reveals the surface texture of the canvas and the subtle shadings of the acrylic paint. When you can see this evidence of the process, you are in the same room with the artist.

Blue Spell, 1964, by Thomas Downing (1928-1985). Photo by giveawayboy, Flickr, Creative Commons

But in that room there was one "Which thing here is not like the others" piece in Morris Louis's Seal (1959), a blue-black-ivory swash of formless abstraction departing from the neat geometries of Downing, Davis, and Villareal.

Upstairs was a tribute to art collector Anita Reiner, to whom Duncan Phillips once said, "Young lady, you always have to meet new art half way." She apparently didn't think much of the Rothkos. 

I especially loved two pieces glancing across the room from each other with complementary compositions of groups of people: Shilpa Gupta's untitled archival print showing schoolboys lined up along a shore, each imposing a "see," "hear," or "speak no evil" gesture on the boy in front of him; and Shirin Neshat's Soliloquy Series (Veiled Women in Three Arches) (1999), another group but not posed, expressing a more natural, quiet but disquieting feeling. With the boys, I felt the story was imposed on them. I would like to know more about both groups, but I was disappointed not to get more caption information, which was hard to find (the captions were grouped on one panel and positioned in the archway entrance to the gallery) and hard to read once you could find them (eye-test small print).

Finally, upstairs were the Neo-Impressionists, those pointillists (and others) who break moments down to study their creation by light and shadow. Here is where you really need to be in the same room with the art works to appreciate them. As I said, I'm usually all about the souvenir exhibition book so I can keep my art experiences alive. But the sample book left in one of the galleries here was a real eye-opener. 

I stopped in front of the mesmerizing Jan Toorop landscape, Broek in Waterland (1889), with its pattern of light and dark, aqua and amber, a twilight sky casting the figures in the foreground into quiet silhouettes. But the plate for this painting in the exhibition catalog didn't come close to matching the live canvas. The book flattened, muddied, and muddled the colors into almost a sepia tone. I held the book up to the light, right below the canvas; another couple in the gallery saw and had the same complaint--no match. In fact, even this image from the Web doesn't adequately capture the canvas in the room, although the figures are sightly more distinct.

Broek in Waterland (1889), Jan Toorop (Dutch, 1858-1928). Image via Wikiart.org

All this is a gentle note to self, Self: Go visit art. You know Paul Klee always makes you smile.

Young Moe (1938) by Paul Klee (Swiss, 1879-1940). Image via The Phillips Collection.

Love, hosaa
Meeting art (old and new) half way.



Thursday, November 27, 2014

Nutcracker Versus The Rats

Back from the first preview performance last night of Round House Theatre's production of The Nutcracker, subtitled "A New Holiday Musical" in the banner ads, but unofficially subtitled, "No, Not That Nutcracker."


Not that that Nutcracker doesn't already have a mad kaleidoscope of variations available for public display, at least in the dance world. Those of us who grew up with the Baryshnikov version (with his then-girlfriend Gelsey Kirkland as Clara dancing all the juiciest roles) are sometimes surprised by the many different ways that the story and the steps can be rearranged. The one that made the most sense to me (and yes, even fantasy needs to make sense) was the Washington Ballet's version at GWU's Lisner Auditorium a couple of decades ago.

The RHT's production of the Hoffmann fairy tale focuses on a family tragedy that interrupts Christmas, and its impacts on the impressionable Clara (is it a nightmare or a nervous breakdown?). At least one major plot point is retained here, in Clara's defeat of the Rat King. (At last year's Joffrey overproduction, if Clara threw her slipper at the fiend, I missed it in the busyness of the stagecraft.)

Oh, sorry, should that have had a spoiler alert? No, the real spoiler here is in the design and staging of the Rat King himself. Honestly, that was my favorite part of this production.

Less successful to me were the fits and starts in the scenes, some empty aural and visual gaps, and a few technical glitches and unevenness in the actors' body mics. Those could just be early-in-the-run issues, but there was just an overall unevenness in the tone throughout.

Even the costume design seemed uneven, with all the imagination going into the dolls and rats, and the "contemporary" family dressed in generic Mid-Twentieth-Century Nostalgia.

I would also like to have seen the musicians and conductor, since this production actually bothered to have live music!
Costume sketch for "Phoebe" doll by Helen Huang (Costume and Puppet Designer), image via Facebook

But the dolls and rats were all delightful, though of course it's disappointing to see a couple of my favorite actors (Erin Weaver, Will Gartshore) buried in makeup design. Oh, well. Their talent couldn't be buried. The Phoebe doll (Weaver) used her pull-chord-triggered recorded phrases with assertive, plot-turning emphasis: "I'm afraid of the dark!" (Cue: hey, let's turn on the lights.)

The updated story no doubt touches a chord in most families--dealing with the loss of a loved one at holiday time. I'm just not sure it's a great way to start celebrating the holidays. Sometimes we just need to make cookies.

Love, hosaa
making cookies

The Nutcracker
Round House Theatre, Bethesda, Maryand, through December 28, 2014
Director: Joe Clarco
Created by Tommy Rapley, Jake Minton (book and lyrics), Phillip Klapperich (book), and Kevin O’Donnell (music), based on the story by E.T.A. Hoffmann

Cast:
Clara: Lauren Williams
David (Clara's father), Rat, Teddy: Mitchell Hébert
Martha (Clara's mother), Rat, dance captain: Sherri L. Edelen
Drosselmeyer, Rat: Lawrence Redmond
Fritz, Nutcracker: Vincent Kempski
Monkey (sock toy): Will Gartshore
Hugo (robot toy): Evan Casey
Phoebe (doll): Erin Weaver

Music director: William Yanesh
Scenic designer: James Kronzer
Costume and pupped designer: Helen Huang
Lighting designer: Daniel MacLean Wagner
Sound designer: Matthew M. Nielsen
Props master: Jennifer Crier Johnston
Dramaturg: Sarah Scafidi




Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Reflections: Art Day Out and Old Friends

Always take the opportunity, when you can, to let art expose itself to you. Downtown for an "informational interview" yesterday, afterwards I found myself once again in the neighborhood of the divine National Museum of Women in the Arts, where I got to visit a few of my old friends - Alice Neel, Frida Kahlo, Elaine de Kooning, Lee Krasner, et al.

I also took more time with some other, iconic pieces in the New York Avenue mansion, including Ellen Day Hale and Lilla Cabot Perry occupying this cozy niche:



Another is Alice Bailly, whose selfie features a peculiar reflection across the lens of her monocle:

Alice Bailly (Swiss, 1872-1938). Self-Portrait, 1917. 
According to the caption, this side of her face is apparently painted out, "reflecting what may be a dissociation of the artist from her own image--in short, an identity crisis." More likely, IMO, it reflects a real reflection, the movement of light across her face at that moment in time. That is, after all, what cubism and the futurist movement were about, incorporating the third and fourth dimensions on flat 2-D surfaces.

But the greatest pleasure is in welcoming some newer (new to me) sisters now exhibiting in the third floor permanent collection, including these sadly sweet kiddies by Amy Sherald:

Amy Sherald (b. 1973, Columbus, Georgia). They Call Me Redbone But I'd Rather Be Strawberry Shortcake, 2009

Amy Sherald (b. 1973, Columbus, Georgia). It Made Sense...Mostly in Her Mind, 2011. 

The captions were helpful to me here; the flattened style was the result of treating the skin tones in "grayscale" (there is some tint, you can see, even in these very poor reproductions. Sorry). The children are dressed playfully, but their somber and expressionless demeanor illustrates a deep-seated sadness. Still, the bright, primary colors in which they "play" give me a sense of innocent hope for them.

The other piece that captivated me at the museum was this (again, playful) Edwina Sandys bronze in its own stairwell niche:

Edwina Sandys (b. 1938, London, England). Flirtation, 1994.

Edwina Sandys (b. 1938, London, England). Flirtation, 1994.


Edwina Sandys (b. 1938, London, England). Flirtation, 1994.
I don't suppose the fact that I'd just had pears and bananas for breakfast had anything to do with why this piece caught my eye! Face it, who doesn't like flirty, birdlike fruit.

The second floor was closed off for between-exhibitions reconfiguring, so my visit was a little shorter than I would have liked. (And when, oh when, will the Mezzanine Cafe ever serve food? Nary a morsel in any of my visits.)

So over the blocks I go toward the Smithsonian American Art Museum to see what's what, and what was what now was the fabulous Richard Estes exhibit. Speaking of old friends! Estes was among the "superrealists" I covered in my senior year seminar on modern art. That was decades ago, and the man is still working his magic!

Okay, I don't want to go to Copyright Jail, so go here to see an example of what Alice Bailly started with that reflection in her monocle:

https://americanart.si.edu/exhibitions/estes


Checkout (2012)

What we see are multiple images, reflected, contorted by other, overlapping realities. In many of the images, people are seen from different angles. The effect of the pictures, though serene in tone, is a taut reminder that we not only see, but are seen by others, whose eyes may see us in twists and turns, fractured and filtered through many surfaces.

Love, hosaa
reflecting on art

P.S. - I still love the old Greyhound Bus Station on New York Avenue. The birds loved it, too:


All photos posted here are by C. G. Wagner. If you use them, credit them, and link back here. Thanks.